To call this movie "silly" would be an insult to silly movies.

Timeline makes the execrable indecency of The Core look like a scientific masterpiece. With costumes borrowed from a traveling Renaissance Festival and actors borrowed from the local community theatre, even the brainless idiocy of From Justin To Kelly reads like Citizen Kane when weighed against this bone-chilling waste of resources which could have gone towards fueling that political lie of making hunger a memory in Africa.

From the modern-day blue-tinted laboratory (replete with grailed platforms, flat-screen monitors which display nothing but cack and things that sparkily go "bzzz" when they explode), to the chain-mailed medieval riders (wielding unwieldy swords and speaking in modern English accents), to the populace of 14th-century France (outfitted in clean rags and milling aimlessly everywhere for atmosphere), every aspect of this movie simply oozes INAUTHENTIC like a Burt Reynolds hairpiece. The appalling acting doesn't help.

Notably pathetic in her role is Frances O'Connor, who performed spectacularly as the troubled mother in A.I: Artificial Intelligence, yet who has forgotten how to stop "indicating" in this movie – her every move an overt caricature of an emotion, like an acting student who has just learned how to "not look at the camera".

Paul Walker, who held up well as a supporting actor alongside the talented Steve Zahn and the delectably sweet Leelee Sobieski in Joy Ride, cannot seem to inhabit his "leading man" role here with any conviction, as his onscreen presence is constantly overpowered by any day-player, mule or piece of rock which accidentally shares the screen with him.

For Billy Connolly, this is one of those roles that he wished he'd never accepted.

Written by Michael Crichton (whose stories have become as hit-and-miss as Stephen King's when translated to the movie screen), the plot centers around some boring English-French war in 1347, into the middle of which modern-day archaeologist Billy Connolly is dropped accidentally, for the sole purpose of having his archaeology students and his shiftless son travel back in time to attempt a rescue. Usually, when this plot device is utilized, the modern-day protagonists exploit their elevated knowledge of history and technology to bode them through the adversity of their escape from the "past". In this piece, that involves time-traveling amulets which never work – and lots of running. And plenty of unbelievably deplorable acting from Frances O'Connor.

While one of the character actors is tripping over his line-read trying to convince us that he's not talking PURE bullshit (but merely a watered down version thereof) regarding the "time-machine" and worm-holes, Paul Walker actually says, "Personally I don't care about the hows and the whys" – and we realize that neither do the film-makers. Immediately, all attempts at explanations regarding the machine's logistics cease and the time-machine is relegated to a McGuffin.

To inspire some shred of dramatic tension (which could not be culled from the inane characters alone) the machine delivers Our Heroes back to the Middle Ages (via the process of fallacious physics) and then promptly blows up, due solely to the WELL-TRAINED MARINE whose first act when stepping out in medieval France was to present himself as an easy target to a bowman, then teleport back with a grenade conveniently about to explode. The other Well-Trained Marine was killed even quicker. Yeh - semper fidelis, my foot!

In a movie like this, when the protagonists' only means of escape is destroyed, there is not one shred of doubt that, by the time the "ticking clock" has reached the final few seconds, some other specious plot device will come into play to Bring The Back Safely. And it does, due to their whining geek physics pal.

Every so often the movie flashes back to "the present"; to the destroyed lab where all the character actors ineffectually bicker over how to reconstruct the time-machine, taking opposing sides simply to create dramatic tension, rather than because they really know what they're talking about, and also to lend gravity to the "ticking clock", which we don't really care about once Frances O'Connor takes the screen again to pain us with more abysmal "acting".

At a certain point, this movie becomes unwatchable. It is pointless to describe banal plot contrivances and indescribably vapid acting performances when the movie is literally glutted with both. And one of the biggest surprises is – it's Richard Donner at the helm! This is the director behind The Omen, Superman, Lethal Weapon. What drove him to this low state? Did he really think that the generational drawcard of Paul Walker would hold up the indolent story and lackluster directing, not to mention the unmentionably insensate acting of Frances O'Connor?

Then there's the French woman who seemingly can't hold onto any particular accent, and who for no discernible reason disguises the fact that she can speak fluent English until the laziness of the plot makes it convenient for her to do so.

Have I mentioned that Frances O'Connor's acting makes Hayden Christensen look like Sir Lawrence Olivier?

The titular "timeline" has nothing at all to do with anything, as these characters in no way seem concerned about altering history for better or worse. As far as we can see, they have no stake in anything except transporting Billy Connolly back to the present, all the while arguing over their time-amulets and shushing each other, whilst a silly and lazily-directed war that doesn't concern them in the least roils around them.

Oh, did I fail to describe Frances O'Connor's dung-heap of a performance? With his talent for bringing out the absolute non-actor in human beings, even George Lucas could not have made her performance any more stilted, stunted, immature and uninformed.

Time travel should exist for the sole purpose of being able to go back and stop this movie from being greenlighted.

Night Arrows!!

END