|
As
a child in Australia, I remember seeing posters for Capricorn
One: the visage of the lone, space-suited astronaut,
movie title scrawled across his glare-shield. Something
foreboding and sobering about that poster had me believing
(as I attained full cucumberhood) that the film was one
of the all-time greats, placed alongside A Clockwork
Orange, or Planet Of The Apes, or Seven Samurai;
a movie that rankled sensibilities and incited societal
disturbance
Upon recently viewing for the first time
this insipid, miscast, paranoic, clueless attempt at professional
film-making, I now realize it would more suitably rank alongside
Ernest Scared Stupid, or Horror Of Party Beach,
or Gamera vs. Gaos.
The
concept might have been brilliant, were it not for the dogged
naïveté exhibited by the screenwriters and technical
personnel, all of whom, it is patently obvious, have never
even push-buttoned a blender from Wal-Mart, let alone worked
or even been allowed near the fail-safe redundant
systems inherent in the NASA space vehicle program.
A
manned mission to Mars is subverted by the very organization
that launches it - NASA. Apparently, the Mars capsule's
life-support system would have failed, killing the three
astronauts (a boring Sam Waterston, an ineffectual James
Brolin and an as-yet-unindicted O.J. Simpson). In an inspired
asinine turn, instead of mathematically proving that they
had the grounds to sue the vendors who created the faulty
system (and to snidely appropriate promised funding should
the mission be a success) NASA executives dive off the deep
end to waste incalculable time and energy on duplicity which
doesn't rectify any problems, save any money, or justify
any effort, by staging a fake Mars landing on a studio set,
whilst confining the astronauts against their will for the
duration of the "mission".
Earth's
media actually buys it - which begs a treatise on stupidity
at least as extensive as an Encyclopedia Britannica 24-volume
set - and everything goes swimmingly until the returning
Mars rocket explodes on re-entry and NASA finds that, in
order to continue the ruse, dem po astronauts gots to go
anyways - but now NASA's going to kill them instead!
'Twould be bittersweet irony if it weren't so damn retarded.
The
underlying motive behind all government collusion of this
ilk is that massive profits be gleaned from the deception.
But even with the aforementioned "funding", the
cover-up costs alone for such a slipshod conspiracy's execution
would far outweigh any reimbursement brought about by legal
income. And that's considering that the cover-up was a success
- the fake mission itself was so sophomorically staged that
it could've been picked apart by any first-year actor pretending
to be a lawyer in any court of law at any time.
Writer/Director
Peter Hyams' story-telling incompetence is astounding to
behold: to fool the whole flight-ops crew and the media
into believing the mission is underway, the conspirators
"replay the radio transmissions of the astronauts'
recorded trial runs over the intercom". Would this
fool anyone remotely cognizant of human communication,
let alone every single veteran technician in constant contact
with the Mars spacecraft? Hyams likes to think we're stupid
enough to believe so. Hal Holbrook (as the NASA executive
helming the conspiracy) almost seems embarrassed when he
voices this idiocy.
Conspiracy
Theorists must have thrown a week-long booze-up when this
movie hit cinemas, cries of "We told you so!"
reverberating off their Lonely-Guy hobbit-hole walls, postered
with tech specs, affidavits, diagrams and blurry photos
all "proving" that the Moon landings were faked
as well.
Hyams'
decision to place NASA - one of the few truly respected,
sorely under-funded, genuinely intellectually adroit institutions
on earth - at the heart of this conspiracy is defamation
of the highest degree. And then (like the Moon-Fakers) to
afford them not one jot of respect, by performing exactly
zilch amount of research in the field of manned space missions.
Technical malfeasance is elevated to the status of a "given",
as scene after scene insults audience intelligence by trying
to sneak in any budget generic hardware or scenery or gadget
that looks "scientific" and by sprinkling the
dialog with any technical terms that sound scientific
to further the ill-contrived illusion. Trust me - it's
all bogus. There is no single area where one can begin
to effectively critique the lack of dedication towards any
kind of plausibility which would lever this film above that
of cack wedged between the treads of my shoe.
Intermittent
snappy dialog between Elliot Gould (when he was still a
leading man) and cross-eyed Karen Black is the only respite
in a film overburdened with superfluous dialog (OJ Simpson
talking to himself as he collapses in the desert), pointless
dialog ("I'm four steps from the bottom, I'm three
steps from the bottom, I'm two steps from the bottom",
as a crewman descends to the "Martian" surface),
and downright idiotic dialog (Telly Savalas' opening lines.
And all the "technical" claptrap).
The
most dangerous aspect of a hideously-deformed piece of trash
like this film is the overwhelming sludge of misinformation
it purveys. Use the time you would have wasted on this movie
reading a book by Carl Sagan or Richard P. Feynman. Not
only will you be more entertained - ya might jess learn
yaself sumpin'.
END
|
|